replace pipenv with pdm?
Created by: Christophe Chaudier
Shouldn't we replace pipenv
, which is decried by the python community, with pdm
, which seems more efficient?
Imported comments:
By Arthur Boudreault on 2024-01-24T17:59:59.214Z
@dangoncalves In your opinion, the stack you are referring to is the easiest way to deal with Python packages?
By Arthur Boudreault on 2024-01-24T17:59:09.562Z
I agree, overall for somebody who isn't really used to Python packages and dependencies, it is actually one of my biggest issues and I've already spent a lot of time just trying to figure out wt* is going on with pipenv
, pyenv
, pdm
...
pdm seems like a good alternative so why not!
By Thomas on 2024-01-24T17:11:43.301Z
I also have several bugs with pipenv
and regularly I have to reset local config to set it good. So any alternative which is working would be good!
By Daniel Gonçalves on 2024-01-19T13:36:11.946Z
Pipenv have several drawbacks and curently I prefer using pyproject.toml with pip, but pdm could be a good alternative.
By Christophe Chaudier on 2024-01-19T13:30:02.408Z
@artybdrlt @michel-thomas @dangoncalves what do you think?
By Christophe Chaudier on 2024-01-19T13:29:23.958Z
changed the description